What’s an encroachment?
Encroachment describes the violation of a homeowner’s property rights. Imagine your next-door neighbor, Frank, decides he is tired of having only a carport and builds a garage. When complete, the structure extends onto your property. This is encroachment.
Encroachment can be intentional or unintentional
And, typically, it’s the latter. Unless you are absolutely sure where your property lines are — down to the inch — you’ll have no way of knowing if you’re encroaching on your neighbor’s property when you decide to plant that gorgeous oleander hedge between the two homes.
And, an easement?
In Hawaii, all beaches are publicly-owned and the public is ensured access to all “land below the high-water mark on any coastal shoreline.”
In other words, should you purchase a home on a beach in our 50th state, you cannot block the public from using that beach. In Kahala (on Oahu) for instance, you’ll find pathways that cut between multi-million- dollar homes, from Kahala Avenue to the water.
These paths are public rights-of-ways, or easements — allowing others to travel or pass through their land. And the homeowners on either side have no say in the matter.
The primary distinction, then, between encroachments and easements, is one of permission.
How to deal with encroachment — and why you must
When an encroachment comes to light, both parties have options. Remember Frank – the neighbor who built his garage partially on your property? Suppose this happened decades before you figured out that he had encroached on your property.
You approach Frank, voicing your displeasure. Your most common options include ignoring the trespass, forcing the removal of the garage, offer Frank an easement or have him sign an encroachment agreement.
All of these remedies require the advice and assistance of an attorney
What if Frank doesn’t like any of these options? He may have one of his own (and you won’t like it): adverse possession.
Yes, another real estate/legal term, but one that has a huge impact, if invoked. Through the adverse possession process, Frank may be able to gain ownership your portion of the land on which the garage sits.
In fact, adverse possession can be used to gain ownership of “just a few feet of property or hundreds of acres,” according to Emily Doskow, attorney and author of “Neighbor Law: Fences, Trees Boundaries & Noise.”
Although state laws vary, Doskow says that courts generally apply a “four-factor test” when looking at adverse possession claims. The occupation of the land must be:
- open and notorious
- exclusive and continuous for a certain period of time
Courts don’t define “hostile” the way we do. In an adverse possession case, it describes that Frank’s possession of your land is hostile to your interests.
Then, the courts will want to see that Frank actually used your land as if he were the owner.
He can prove this, according to Doskow, if he can produce records showing he maintained or improved the property or paid taxes on it.
The third factor of the test is that Frank’s use of your property must be obvious “to anyone – including a property owner.”
Finally, Frank must prove that he controlled the land exclusively (meaning he didn’t share it with you) and that he did so for certain amount of time (which varies by state).
How to avoid adverse possession
When determining how to deal with encroachment, it’s important to keep Frank’s option in mind.
Your best option, in any type of encroachment, may be to either offer to rent the offender that piece of your property or grant him an easement.
But, it is critical that you contact a real estate attorney who will help you consider all possible options. And do it quickly because there is a statute of limitations (a written law prescribing a period of limitation for the bringing of certain kinds of legal action).
Communication of information by, in, to or through this blog and Web site and your receipt or use of it (1) is not provided in the course of and does not create or constitute an attorney-client relationship, (2) is not intended as a solicitation, (3) is not intended to convey or constitute legal advice, and (4) is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney.
Powered by WPeMatico